At the prominent edge of the handheld gaming tool market, two giants have risen to the top: the Retroid Pocket 3 (RP3) and the RG351P. This comparison will delve into the nitty-gritty of each device, exploring features, capabilities, user experience, and games compatible, aiding buyers in choosing the superior portable game console for their needs.
Performance and Software
Let’s begin with the heart of every handheld gaming tool: its technical capabilities. The emphasized feature of RP3 is its dual boot system, Android OS and Retroid OS, allowing users the flexibility between retro gaming and smartphone-like features. However, this feature may be demanding for non-techie users.
On the contrary, RG351P operates on Open Source Operating Systems like Emuelec and ArkOS. It is more accessible and user-friendly, especially for those prioritizing out-of-the-box gaming rather than multimedia potential. However, having a locked system may inhibit advanced players from customizing their experience.
The RP3 boasts a 1.5 GHz quad-core processor, 2GB DDR3 RAM, and 16GB eMMC storage, which is expandable via a TF Card (up to 256GB). This edges it ahead of the RG351P, which has a 1.5 GHz dual-core processor, 1GB RAM, and the same storage options.
Screen and Display
Moving onto the screen and display, the Retroid Pocket 3 offers a 3.5-inch IPS screen, generating a crisp, vibrant, and altogether mesmerizing display. This is a significant improvement over the Retroid Pocket 2, showcasing brighter colors and better viewing angles.
In comparison, the RG351P also has a 3.5-inch IPS screen but stays with a 3:2 aspect ratio. This aspect ratio simplifies for better scaling with older games but doesn’t do justice with modern gaming experiences unlike the RP3’s 4:3 ratio display.
Controls and Comfort
The RG351P trumps the RP3 when it comes to controls and comfort. It has been praised for its well-spaced button layout, including the L1,L2,R1,R2 trigger buttons and dual analog sticks, making gameplay comfortable in long sessions.
In comparison, despite the Retroid Pocket 3 displaying a similar gaming layout, it slightly lags in this department due to the less tactile response of the buttons and D-pad. Nevertheless, comparably, the difference in this aspect is minor and could boil down to personal preference.
Game Library
Both devices support an array of game systems, including PlayStation 1, PSP, Nintendo DS, SNES, and many others. The Retroid Pocket 3, with Android OS, offers access to Play Store where users can download various game emulator apps, broadening the pool of games they can play.
In comparison, RG351P has a narrower, but still extensive game library. Using Open Source Systems, it enables players to add numerous ROMs of their choice. However, the lack of direct access to Google play store slightly hampers its versatility.
Battery Life
The battery life of both handhelds is adequate, at around 6 hours of gameplay. The Retroid Pocket 3 powers through with a 4000mAh Li-on battery, while the RG351P is equipped with a 3500mAh. Only a minor difference, but worth noting for those marathon gaming sessions.
Price
As of writing, the Retroid Pocket 3 is slightly more expensive than the RG351P. This price jump is primarily due to its dual boot system and better specifications. However, for pure gaming enthusiasts, the price difference may not justify the upgrade, as the RG351P offers a robust gaming experience at a cheaper price.
Conclusion
Ultimately, both handhelds offer spectacular gaming experiences. The Retroid Pocket 3 stands out with its Android interface, better specs, and broader game compatibility through the Play Store. However, RG351P provides a user-friendly, simple system that appeals to those who fancy a fuss-free, vintage gaming experience. Both choices have their merits – what truly matters is aligning these with individual preferences and needs.
